जिंदगी और मौत

Standard

जिन्दा थे तो किसी ने
पास भी बिठाया नहीं,
अब खुद मेरे चरों
और बैठे जा रहे हैं|
पहले कभी किसी ने
मेरा हाल न पूछा
अब सभी आंसू
बहाए जा रहे हैं|
एक रुमाल भी भेंट नहीं किया
जब हम जिन्दा थे,
अब शालें और कपडे ऊपर
से ओढ़ाये जा रहे हैं|
सबको पता है की शालें और
कपडे इसके काम के नहीं
मगर फिर भी बेचारे दुनियादारी
निभाए जा रहे हैं|
कभी किसी ने एक वक्त का
खाना तक नहीं खिलाया,
अब देसी घी मेरे मूंह
में डाले जा रहे हैं|
जिंदगी में एक कदम भी
साथ न चल सका कोई,
अब फूलों से सजाकर
कंधे पे उठाए जा रहे हैं|
आज पता चला कि मौत
जिंदगी से बेहतर है,
हम तो बेवजह ही जिंदगी
कि चाहत किये जा रहे हैं|

— कैलाश गुप्ता

किस ओर चली नदी

Standard

बेचैन रहती है नदी
क्यों सागर की खातिर,
मिलना जिसमें मिट जाना है …
खुद खार होना है

अनदेखा करती
चली जाती है
जंगल के प्यार को लेकिन
हरा होता है जो उस से
जिस में वह खुद
हरी होती है|

— नन्द किशोर आचार्य जी

Science of Experiential Validation

Standard

Generally we feel that Experiences of a human being are subjective and we can not talk about them Scientifically. We feel that everybody’s desires, thoughts, expectations, imagination, feelings etc. are different so we can not have a common basis to talk about them. It is said that there is no objectivity in them and it seems that there can not be. Ultimately it leads to the conclusions like everybody’s preferences are different, everybody’s desires, thoughts, expectations are different, everybody’s Truth is different and everybody is different.

Experiences differ from Physical realities in certain way which make their study difficult or different. Experiences can only be observed by the Experiencer i.e. the person who is experiencing them. Experiences can not be accessed by any other person by any means, other than the person who is experiencing them.  Experiences are said to be personal and subjective. Physical realities on the other hand are observable and verifiable through senses. Experiences can not be observed through senses. Sensory observations are relatively easier to observe and validate than Experiences.  This distinction doesn’t make Experiences unobservable, they are just observed differently.

Like, observing a chair in front of our eyes and observing “willingness to live with happiness” (or even “willingness to live”, “willingness to live with Trust”, “willingness to live with Respect”) are two different things. First is sensory, second is not. Second can only be observed within us. It is not unobservable. The way we can make mistakes in observations through senses and in experimentation, the same way there is possibility of making mistakes in correctly identifying and recognizing our own Experiences. For example “willingness to live with happiness” is something which can only be observed within. One may be unaware of it till it is observed within, but when a person who has experienced it within draws other person’s attention towards it and other person pays attention to it and realizes it within then it is validated for that person that it is true for him as well. This is what is called Experiential Validation.

Claim in this post is, internal realities or Experiences are not completely subjective in nature. They are as objective in nature as we feel Physical realities are. It is just the matter of practice that we are not trained to introspect and self reflect so we miss many of the internal realities (Experiences) or are totally unaware of them.

Since these internal realities are not observable through senses so their observation might seem difficult. A person who has “seen” these realities by himself can draw our attention towards them and we can validate by ourselves if that is true. Results in Experiential Validation may not be instantaneous. The observation itself may take years to be correctly made. It also depends on the “need” of the person who is observing. Without “need”, it is hard to make observation within. More strong the “need” is, the more precise observation can be made, and also observation makes “need” for further deeper observations more strong, so in this way it is reinforcing in itself.

A person who has already observed the realities whether internal or external can make the observations for others easy with his guidance, without which the process of observation may become extremely difficult, specially in case of Experiential Validation.

Relationship or Domination?

Standard

Most of our Relationships today are based on Domination and the worst part is, we are unaware of it!

Our intention or willingness is to live with Relationship but we try to fulfill that intention or willingness through Domination. In most of our relationships today, what we try to do is to dominate. In fact our relationships, acquaintances are based on domination. Those who let us dominate them we feel comfortable with them. Those who do not, we feel uncomfortable with them and want to dominate them somehow. Those who do not contradict us, do not speak against us, be polite with us, keep appreciating us, look up at us, feel good about us, have perception towards us the way we want, we feel comfortable with them. Those who contradict us, may even speak against us, may not appreciate us, may even look down at us, we feel uncomfortable with them and want to dominate them with the expectation that after this conditions will be favorable to us. We want to be looked up, we want to be appreciated, we want other person to feel good about us, we want a comfortable environment as per our preferences, we want others perceptions towards us as per our expectations, as per our preferences, as we see ourselves!

This kind of domination can be seen in all our relationships, be it, parent-children relationship, brother-sister relationship, friends, acquaintances or whatsoever. In fact domination in relationships is independent of the name of relationship. Even our caring, responsibilities, which we take  pride in doing are also filled in with the self interest and domination. Most of our interactions with other human beings can fall into this category of domination.

Interesting thing is, none of us like to be dominated but we all like to dominate. When we are being dominated then we feel bad and try to dominate the person who is trying to dominate us.

The question which arises is, why do we try to dominate? What is the basic motivation behind it?

We all evaluate ourselves. We evaluate ourselves on the basis “of something”, like our intellect, beauty, power, position, money etc. Mostly our evaluations are based on popular notions in the society. The way people have perceived us sometime or the other in our life, we start perceiving ourselves the same way and then expect others around us to perceive the same way we perceive ourselves. This is where the problem of domination germinates.

We evaluate ourselves “some way” and then expect people around us to evaluate us the same way. In fact we want those people around us who have the perception towards us the way we want, the way we like, the way we expect. Those who see ourselves the way we want we see them as relatives and those who do not we get a feeling of opposition for them and then we want to dominate them.

In most of the cases we are not even aware that such a phenomenon is happening inside us. We just keep living in reaction without understanding what is happening inside us.

So what is the way out of it?

If we see closely then it is the relative evaluation which is becoming the cause of all these problems. We evaluate ourselves relatively and expect others around us to evaluate the same way. We all have this need to have our right evaluation within ourselves. This need is ever actively present in us. We see that relative evaluation is becoming the cause of problems so there is a need to have absolute evaluation. Unless or until we have our certain and consistent evaluation of ourselves with us the problems which we saw above are not going to be resolved.

To have our absolute evaluation with ourselves we need knowledge. Knowledge is Knowledge of Self, Knowledge of Entire Existence and Knowledge of Natural Human Conduct.

Can a Robot feel Pain?

Standard

Suppose we have already made a robot which behaves exactly like a human being. When you talk to him, you do not even realize that you are talking to a robot. The kind of face expressions he makes, the way he talks, the way he behaves makes you feel that he is in reality a real human being!

When you pinch on his hand, he tries to save himself by taking his hand away, with wrinkles on his face, exactly like a human being. This makes you feel that robot is actually feeling the pain. Lets further try to dig into it and find out what is happening inside it. Lets try to see what must/can be happening inside such a robot.

Lets take the case of his behavior when he is pinched on his hand. Since this is a robot which can behave exactly like a human being, so there must be touch sensors spread all over his body. When his hand is pinched, some touch sensors recognize the pressure and send a signal to the operating system installed somewhere in the robot. This signal comes to operating system in the form of an interrupt. There must be an interrupt vector in the operating system which maps this interrupt to a subroutine which is supposed to execute. As soon as operating system receives the interrupt it triggers the corresponding subroutine. In the subroutine it is calculated how much pressure on what location is applied and correspondingly what action need to be taken. This action is also predefined or learned on the basis of past training. In this particular case it happens that robot takes his hand back and makes a wrinkly face. This is all what could be happening inside the robot, an interrupt giving rise to the execution of a program, giving rise to the movements of some limbs. One might say that this is very naive explanation of activities going on inside the robot. I am ready to take any kind of complex processing/model you can bring. You can bring as advanced data mining algorithms as you can, you can bring as complex artificial neural networks as you can, you can bring any kind of “computational” model as you can and make a robot which behaves the way I described and give an explanation of what is going on inside the robot. I am ready to take your version of robot.

The question which comes here is when this robot is pinched on his hand, did it actually feel any kind of “pain”?

I say a strict No. If you say Yes, then you must explain how and where? I could not see any place in robot either hardware or software which may be responsible for the “feeling of pain”. What we have done in above example is, we have made a robot which is “behaviorally” same as a human being, but can a robot be “intentionally” same as a human being? We can simulate the “expression” of pain but can we simulate the “feeling of pain” itself?

There may be a lot of processing happening inside the robot, it may be as complex as you can imagine, but processing doesn’t imply there is some feeling inside it. If there is feeling then our computers, tube lights, fans, geysers any kind of complex devices will start “feeling” different kind of things, but we do not see any kind of manifestation of this.

Here it is implied that any kind of “computational” model is not sufficient for realizing “feelings”. One can simulate the behavior/expression part of it but realizing feelings is entirely a different case than simulating it.

This thought experiment also negates the possibility of Strong AI. Strong AI presumes that a machine can realize all the human phenomenon. In above thought experiment we see that it is not possible. It shows that Strong AI is wrong. A robot is nothing but a feelingless mechanical device. It is not that in a machine feelings are partial or to some percentage, they are absolutely zero. It is also not that with the advancement of science and technology, in future we will be able to develop a robot which will be able to realize all the human phenomenon. A robot can “never” feel pain or anything, independent of how advanced science and technology become. It is “in principle” not possible for a robot to feel pain.

I know it will create a lot of questions and arguments in readers minds for which I request them to comment on this blog. I would like to suggest readers to limit themselves to the machine and then discuss the issue rather than coming to a human being. Believe me discussing a machine is easier than a human being.

Please read following article I wrote later to understand the concept much deeper:

Chinese Room Argument: A Robot Cannot Feel Pain

Dharamveer: To what extent Preconditioning can lead …

Standard

Watch following YouTube video to see what I want to say.

‘Dharamveer’ is a common man at peace. Conflicting and competing ideologies confront him. His innocence and confusion vanishes when he finds himself trapped in an ideological web.

How preconditioning can make a human being to do anything!

There is a need to look within and identify what is preconditioning and what is natural!

Life of a Security Guard

Standard

Almost all of the security guards at IIIT-H are my friends. I planned to talk to one of them today. His name is Kumar Swami. I asked him (In Hindi), “Can I talk to you bhaiyya for some time if you are free?”.

Oh Yes Sure, he said.

I will ask you a few questions, would you like to answer them for me?

Yes please ask.

Why do you want to ask me questions bhaiyya, he asked.

I want to know about you that how you live and I will let others also know about it, I said.

OK bhaiyya ask me whatever you want, he said with a pleasant smile on his face.

What is your name?

Kumar Swami

Which place do you belong to?

Warangal (Parakkal)

Are you married?

Yes, I have two children.

Where in Hyderabad you live?

Masid Banda.

How much IIIT-H gives you (salary)?

7500 Rs per month.

How much is your house rent?

1500 Rs.

What are your work timings?

It is 12 hours a day. Sometimes day shift and sometimes night shift. 8 to 8.

How many days a week you work?

7 days a week.

I was amazed! I was thinking he will say 6 days, but 7 days a week, 12 hours a day duty is too much!

In which class your kids study?

One is in 1st class and other is in 2nd.

Which school they are in?

Shri Rama Public School.

What is their school fees?

2000 Rs per month for both.

Your wife also works?

Yes, she does stitching.

How much she is able to earn?

1000 Rs per month.

What your parents do?

They are in agriculture.

How much land you do they have in warangal?

A big piece of land.

Why did you migrate to Hyderabad?

No job available in Warangal.

How do you manage your family with money you and your wife earn?

In total we earn: 7500 + 1000 = 8500 Rs.

Out of which (per month expenditure), 1500 for rent, 2000 for school fees of kids, 2000 food expenditure, 500 Rs for travelling in public transport, others and around 1000 to 2000 Rs I save in bank.

Are you happy doing this job?

Not really. In this job I have very less time to sleep, very less time to take care of my health, my eating habits and timings have gone bad, I eat at 6 in the morning and come here and sometimes I have lunch in the afternoon otherwise directly dinner, I am left with no time for my family and other things even if I want to do them.

How are you relationships with your family members at home?

They are good.

Do you smoke or drink?

No

What did you want to become in your life?

After I completed my studies I wanted to settle in life, wanted to do a job or businness.

What would you like to become in your next birth?

A big officer.

How students, staff, faculty etc. treat you here?

They treat me well. Students call me bhaiyya and staff and faculty are also good. Faculty and staff call me “Security”.

Do they give you respect?

Yes.

What do you think about people? How do you find students and faculty here?

Everybody is good.

Here I stopped asking anymore questions. I said, “I am very happy to talk to bhaiyya. You are  an inspiration for us in many ways “.

He was sitting on his chair, I requested him to get up and then I gave him a “Jadoo ki Jhappi”.

He was quite happy, my eyes were also slightly moist.

This is where we finished our conversation.

I will not write my personal views or interpretation on this conversation. It is left on the reader to read and interpret their ways.

दुनिया बहुत बड़ा पागलखाना है

Standard

सरल सहज जीवन है भैय्या,
इसे मत उलझाओ रे ..
जीना बहुत सरल है उसको
समझो और समझाओ रे …

देखो सरल अस्तित्व यहाँ ..
सरल सहज सहयोगी ..
मानव को छोड़ यहाँ, हैं सब निरोगी ..
संबंध भी कोई वस्तु है इसको
समझो और समझाओ रे …

सरल सहज जीवन है भैय्या,
इसे मत उलझाओ रे ..

सदा सुखी जीवन जीना ही
हर मानव की  प्यास है ..
बिना समझ के व्यवहार कार्य से ..
सभी यहाँ उदास हैं|
पहचानों अपने आप को रे भैय्या ..
और सुखी हो जाओ रे ..

सरल सहज जीवन है भैय्या,
इसे मत उलझाओ रे ..

मिटटी पानी पेड़ पशु ..
सभी हैं तेरे सहयोगी ..
इन सबका है आचरण निश्चित,
हैं ये सब सच्चे योगी …
समझदार हो मानव धरा तो ..
स्वर्ग पाओ रे …

सरल सहज जीवन है भैय्या,
इसे मत उलझाओ रे ..

सब संबंधी सभी सगे हैं ..
है यहाँ नहीं कोई ढोंगी ..
संबंध में ही होता है मानव सुखी …
बस मान्यता से ही है रोगी ..
मान्यता से मुक्त हो कर रे भैय्या,
संबंध के सुख को पाओ रे …

सरल सहज जीवन है भैय्या,
इसे मत उलझाओ रे ..
जीना बहुत सरल है उसको
समझो और समझाओ रे …

Teachers’ Day: A note of Thanks

Standard

Dear All,

Kindly allow me to express my sincere gratitude towards you for all the things I learned, received from you directly as well as indirectly. I can never forget your kindness, generosity, patience and love which I received in past. It helped me in growing in all the aspects of life and is in fact still helping. I find myself a fortunate person that I this got opportunity of being around all of you in last few years.

All the things I received from you, have made an indelible mark on my heart. I am in your debt.

I seek your forgiveness, for all those mistakes I made knowingly or unknowingly in past. I can assure you about my intention but I must confess I lack the competence.

Thanks a lot.

Devansh

How Money changes our Value System?

Standard

Money as a standard for giving value should match with how human beings subjectively give value. If there is a mis-match, it may lead to those things being valued, which human beings actually do not value.

This is an interesting point in the sense, it addresses three questions that

  1. How human beings give value to various things when money system is not there or in general?

  2. How that valuation changes when money comes in between?

  3. What changes have come to system when money is introduced?

I will address first question first.

For a human being giving a particular value to a particular thing depends on several factors like, availability of basic resources to him, his earning, his dependents, his sources of resources, his relationships with others around him, his own understanding, his mood at a time, culture he lives in, place he lives in, his preferences and several more. The value given by an individual varies with space, time and may differ for each individual.

We can see many examples:-

  1. In general a human being first seeks happiness in material, which doesn’t give him continuity of it, then he starts seeking the same in relationships, where he starts seeing the possibility of continuity but due to lack of knowledge he is not able to ensure its continuity and ultimately he starts moving towards knowledge which can ensure its continuity. Intensity of happiness in respect to time in continuous with Knowledge, Long lasting in Relationships and Temporary in Material. When a human being is unresolved within, he searches for happiness in Relationships and when he is not able to find it even there then he searches it in Material.

  2. Poor person may give more value to basic amenities, but a rich person may not.

  3. When I am in good mood then I do not feel that need for material pleasures much. When I am in bad mood I resort on to material pleasures like movies, music, tasty food, roaming in market etc.

  4. When I am alone the value of my friends increases for me.

  5. When my relationships with others are going well then my dependency on material pleasures and external recognition and respect decreases. When relationships are not going well then my dependency on material pleasures increases.

  6. Value of material pleasures for me also depends on my understanding. If my understanding is more then I give more value to relationships than material. I am more contended within.

  7. The place, society and culture I belong to also contribute to the things I give value.

  8. My ambitions, goals, things I consider important definitely contribute to what things I will give value in my life.

  9. What things are considered to be important in society, by me and by others around me also alter my value system towards things.

  10. I may give more value to a particular thing today but may not give it the same value tomorrow. Value of things changes for me with respect to time.

  11. My valuation also changes with respect to space. A thing which is valued more in a particular place might lose its value at some other. Like if I am living in a very hot place then the value of cooler might increase for me than if I am living in a cooler place.

  12. Such valuation measures are also different for different individuals. There is a variation on the basis of individuals too.

  13. Same thing may have different value for me at different times. Like if I am feeling resolved within then I may value pizza less than when I am feeling contradictions within.

  14. I may value Jalebi more when my stomach is empty than my stomach is full.

There can be several more. All these things give an idea of what all things a human being give value to, on the basis of different factors.

Coming to Second question:-

Money introduces a common valuation/price tag of commodities for all kind of people. Like for a poor person 100 Rs may be sustenance for 2-3 days but for a rich person it is probably nothing more than a cigar.

When money is introduced in the system then this valuation varies a lot. The basic problem which comes with money is that people start assuming that

Money = Resource, Money = Security

This is the basic misconception which gets associated with money. Money is a symbol and not the resource itself. If say after 50 years from now our lands become infertile, production decreases, global warming creates many more problems, pollution increases then what one can do with money. Money is nothing more than a piece of paper if resource is not available. Resources on earth are limited. Money as a symbol may be available in infinity but not the resource. When one starts assuming money as resource then he wants to accumulate more and more money so that he is assured of getting continuity of resource in his house. In this process he does not do any production work. His main intention is to accumulate more and more money than to produce anything. In this process he wants to indulge into production of those things which can fetch him more money. If we see in current society, the things which should not be valued much are being valued more. Like, diamond has no value as far as the living of an individual is concerned, but it is being valued more than potato, tomato and other basic things which are the basic requirements of a human being. Now people who are involved in production, distribution of diamonds and its jeweleries are earning a lot. So, more and more people now want to indulge into production of diamonds, because it will fetch them more and more money. There are two problems here, over-evaluation of a thing like diamond, which is happening actually due to lack of understanding of an individual and misconception in an individual that Money = Resource, which is also nothing but lack of understanding. Ultimately it boils down to the lack of understanding of an individual only.

Here one can see that the things which are not really valuable to an individual become more valuable to him when money is introduced in the system and standard of valuation becomes money.

One more misconception which comes along is

Money = Happiness, Money = Respect, Money = Relationships

These misconceptions also make an individual to accumulate more and more money. The more money he has the more he feels that he has respect, security in relationships. The problem which comes here is, when it is assumed that Money can ensure Respect and Relationships then an individual needs infinite money.

Money = Power to exploit.

Money being a non-perishable resource can be used as and when required and also gives an opportunity and flexibility to owners of it to exploit a person who is involved in production of resources. Resources are perishable, but money is not. A person who is involved in production of say grains has his source of income from selling grains only. Grains are perishable, so after some time he may be ready to sell them for lower costs. A person who has money which is not perishable is more secure in terms of availability of resources.

Money = Variability in cost of living.

If we take an example of Hyderabad, here the cost of living has increased a lot in past some time. This is because a few set of people specially software engineers in Hyderabad earn more than many. They are ready to pay more. Due to which prices/rents of various things in Hyderabad have increased a lot in past few years. This causes problems to those who are not in software fields, like government employees. It is really difficult for them to survive in a place like Hyderabad now, so they start indulging into various bad practices like bribery. A person who has more money is ready to pay more because he has more paying capability, because of this prices of things shoot up. This brings variability in the cost of living in a particular place and others might not be able to sustain that. This is one more problem which comes up.

Money = Invention of many useless jobs just for money accumulation.

When a “symbolic resource” like money comes into picture then it gives rise to several such jobs which are totally useless and non-productive. Basic purpose of such jobs is just to accumulate more and more money without doing anything. One of such jobs is, Real estate business. They buy and sell lands, houses and other properties and make profit out of them. Share markets are one more example of it.

Money = Reduction of production.

More and more people now want to indulge into production of things which can fetch them more and more money. Most of such high paying jobs are useless and non-productive. When more and more people are getting involved into such kind of jobs so people who are involved in production of resources of basic needs are very less. This leads to lack of production in state/country which creates further more problem like interdependence, lack of self sufficiency, wars for resource accumulation.

Money = Overconsumption of resources, lack of sensitivity towards environment and nature. Leading to consumerism.

With money one begins to forget the real value of things, what all is required in order to produce things, who all are involved in production of those things which are in use, where the raw material of things I am using coming from, what production methodologies are being used and whether this product which I am using is maintaining balance in nature or not. This kind of system just increases consumerism. What it has produced is just a set of insensitive consumers.

Money = Promotes a life style which is not good for health

Nature has its own natural ways of production. When a man works in alignment with those ways it is good for his health also. Production in natural ways involves a lot of physical labor also which is required for the body. When this is not available in right amounts it creates several health problems which we already see. In current jobs there is no bodily exercise involved.

Money = Gives surface to centralization for power and monopoly. Gives rise to exploitation of people, long working hours and repetitive non-creative works.

This symbolic resource as money also gives opportunity to system to centralize the power and authority, which leads to several problems like slavery and exploitation. Mis evaluation of things is already there, like diamond being evaluated as more than grains. Over this when symbolic resource like money is also available then those who are involved in production of diamonds and owners of the production factory or mill get the power to exploit poor by giving them poor wages, selling products on higher costs, thus exploiting consumer also. Their major objective is to increase their profits. In such conditions they can make you work whatever they want, however they want and for as much time as they want. This leads to exploitation of people and long working hours. As a mater of fact those who are involved in production of say diamonds are only able to buy them.

One more example which can be given here is the example of software industry. They make you work for long hours, make you to do non-creative works and people do not have other options also.

Money = A lot of insecurity in system

When a system on monopoly/centralized power is created there comes a lots of insecurity. Owner can fire anybody anytime. Other jobs do not allow one to sustain. One becomes more and more bound to join big factories and become dependent on system.

Money = Migration

Most of the villagers migrate to cities to secure their living. It is not the only reason though for their migration, but yes definitely a major contributing reason. When cost of various things keep increasing villagers find it difficult to sustain their life in villages, they come under debts too and are bound to migrate to cities and join factories and mills. It leads to a lot of migration, further decrease in production of basic resources, over population in cities and increase in the number of consumers which further worsens the situation.

Money = Exploitation of nature.

More and more money accumulation requires factory owners, mill owners, farmers and many others to adopt non-cyclic ways of production in order to increase their production multi-folds. The means which they use to increase production of resources cause land, water, soil, air pollution.

Money = Dissatisfaction in Individual and Poor Relationships in Family

All above things start from misconceptions within. They lead to a complex lifestyle. It causes problems at the level of individual and also in family.

At the level of Individual:-

The basic assumption for adopting a complex lifestyle at the level of individual is that it will bring him more happiness, prosperity, respect and relationships. In reality it doesn’t happen. In this lifestyle a person is more indulged in material pleasures and measures happiness, respect, relationships in terms of material, which is not fulfilling to him himself and also not to others around him. A human being wants Happiness, Trust, Respect, Mutual Fulfillment in relationships all the time. This thing can not be ensured with material. There is no continuity of happiness in material. Respect due to material is always relative but a human being wants certainty, consistency and continuity of respect. Feeling in relationships on the basis of material is not consistent but a human being desires for continuity of feeling of being relatedness. In this way a complex, materialistic lifestyle doesn’t lead to satisfaction within.

On the other hand since complex lifestyle demands more and more material facilities, so it brings a lot of maintenance work also along with it to maintain those equipments and facilities. It requires more work and less free time is available to develop other higher faculties in man. Ultimately it leads to a vicious circle, in which a man stucks.

At the level of family:-

At the level of family complex lifestyle leads to poor relationships. One is more and more indulged into increasing and maintaining the lifestyle he is leading and thus lesser time is available with family members. Husband and wife both are working and they keep babysitters to take care of their children. They keep their children in boarding schools. They consider their children as a burden. Husband and wife, they themselves lack time to interact with each other. They go to office early in the morning and come late night. Since they do not spend much time at home so they eat outside which affects their heath also. They work for long hours since maintaining and increasing a complex lifestyle requires work for long hours. Ultimately it leads to disharmony at the level of family.

Ultimately we see that those who are involved in production of diamonds are earning in lacks and those who are involved I production of grains are suiciding. Those who are involved in production of diamonds are able to living luxuriously. Now they even indulge in agriculture. They buy lands and keep farmers as labors. Their main intention is to increase profit only. In course of this madness of increasing profits they adopt methods of production which are not good for land, water and air. They use several fertilizers, which pollute lands, kills insects and earthworms which help in increasing fertility of soil and loosening it. In long run soil keeps becoming more and more infertile. Ultimately if we see then we find that entire market and system is being captured by big companies, multinational companies, factories and many more and not even governments are not able to control them, rather are succumbing to them.

In the end one can say that with the introduction of money as a symbolic resource system has given surface to the madness of human being to increase pleasure, profit and comfort and it has ultimately lead to Pleasure Centric Psychology, Profit Centric Economy and Comfort Centric Sociology.

Ultimately the thing reduces to lack of understanding in an individual only. Only with Right Understanding in individual can the system change.